Asus DSEB-DG/SAS

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus DSEB-DG/SAS (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090302
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '17 at 13:14
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5472 108 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 28.4 GHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 84.1 40% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 325 29% 246 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700 1,068 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 055F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 307.45 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 7.15 Parallax 2.38 6% 5.59 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 4.65 4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 394GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3719 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 467 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 438 (EB) Unknown 99 99 216 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6122080246	49.9% Average	Read 253 Write 174 Mixed 173 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 18.8 82% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 72.5 DQ Mixed 40.9 46% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 126%
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240 2,095 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 209GB free Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5440 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 801 (AB) Unknown 80 80 36474192 (AE) Unknown 100 100 759 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 215 (D2) Unknown 100 100 1377 (E9) Unknown 93 93 93 (F1) Unknown 100 100 13649 (F2) Unknown 100 100 32066 (F9) Unknown 100 100 2993757311	56.9% Above average	Read 255 Write 249 Mixed 260 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 25.7 82% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 66.8 67% 110 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 111%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4636 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 548 (B1) Unknown 98 98 40 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 680 (EB) Unknown 99 99 297 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5887387511	38.7% Below average	Read 243 Write 136 Mixed 139 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 12.6 56% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 99 DQ Write 78 DQ Mixed 44.8 45% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 116%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 1.5TB 431GB free Firmware: 3000 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.1% Good	Read 114 Write 112 Mixed 183 105% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 3.31 4K Mixed 0.6 162% 1.57 MB/s

Lsilogic Logical Volume 298GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 210GB free Firmware: 3000 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	127% Outstanding	Read 214 Write 227 Mixed 204 162% 215 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 4.66 4K Mixed 1.22 268% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 127%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 7.9 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus DSEB-DG/SAS

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)