Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '20 at 21:11
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	82%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 68.5 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 136 54% 92 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 500 48% 394 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	141% Outstanding	Lighting 189 Reflection 198 Parallax 220 154% 203 fps	MRender 230 Gravity 194 Splatting 127 144% 184 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,958 Write 1,287 Mixed 525 275% 1,257 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 45.7 172% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 831 DQ Write 710 DQ Mixed 549 472% 696 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB 30,033 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 565GB free Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 1388 1376 1384 1392 1390 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 863 Write 1,078 Mixed 966 SusWrite 1,385 244% 1,073 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 66.5 220% 77.7 MB/s	DQ Read 663 DQ Write 852 DQ Mixed 881 631% 799 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 305%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 596GB free Firmware: 1AA01114 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 113 113 99 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 115 Write 94.7 Mixed 59 SusWrite 109 69% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 195 203 203 203 200 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 148 Write 188 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 200 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 237% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 732GB free Firmware: CC26 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 108 Write 114 Mixed 70.3 72% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3600 C16 Series 2x8GB 298 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 25.7 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,434x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	231x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)