Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA720
Memory	42.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '20 at 11:36
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 83 1-Core 129 2-Core 256 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 667 69% 556 Pts	64-Core 825 51% 825 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 3000) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 114 Parallax 109 91% 112 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 102 Splatting 91.9 90% 113 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 926 737 636 613 584 565 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,066 Write 1439 Mixed 1,421 SusWrite 677 312% 1,401 MB/s	4K Read 59.9 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 78 254% 85.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,174 DQ Write 1,056 DQ Mixed 1,118 838% 1116 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 410%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 199GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 162 222 158 163 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 944 Write 358 Mixed 1,036 SusWrite 271 145% 652 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 67.6 225% 78.3 MB/s	DQ Read 985 DQ Write 694 DQ Mixed 322 381% 667 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 282%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 029E CMSX32GX4M1A2666C18 47GB 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 25.9 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 25.9 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	171x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	74x
RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 90%, 7,789 samples	44x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	30x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	47x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	40x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	61x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	33x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16