Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '20 at 05:01
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD EPYC (with IBPB) 173 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 286 80% 156 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 288 38% 287 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 21GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,001 Write 1,532 Mixed 2,360 1,735% 2,297 MB/s	4K Read 59.1 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 56 9,505% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 97.2 881% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 81%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 38GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 52 22 24 24 24 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 138 Write 58.6 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 34.1 85% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.7 140% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 34.1 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 26.4 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16