| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140409 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 02 '20 at 19:27 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.6%
Very good
|
63% 102 Pts
|
43% 349 Pts
|
26% 427 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
102%
Outstanding
|
99% 149 fps
|
111% 137 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 71 90 90 89 91 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
78% 349 MB/s
|
160% 54.2 MB/s
|
150% 215 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
258GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 127 127 123 MB/s
|
69.5%
Good
|
87% 117 MB/s
|
221% 1.57 MB/s
| |
|
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 64GB-$8
57GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 6.3 7.2 7.3 7.4 9.4 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
34% 30 MB/s
|
36% 2.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.9%
Above average
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
62% 64.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |