Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X409JA
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '20 at 17:40
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 81.7 1-Core 133 2-Core 238 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 582 70% 541 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1EB1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 28.20.100.8322 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.24% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 8.5 7% 8.83 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 7.97 Splatting 1.3 5% 7.25 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.24% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB 3,002 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 423 425 425 425 426 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,172 Write 1,209 Mixed 1,107 SusWrite 439 220% 982 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 69.7 250% 94.4 MB/s	DQ Read 833 DQ Write 870 DQ Mixed 737 586% 813 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 179%
Adata HV300 1TB 234 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 895GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 33.6 Write 32 Mixed 34.4 SusWrite 15.3 22% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB 54,777 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 21.8 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	60x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	53x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	113x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	17x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	15x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	8x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	30x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	30x
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16