Positivo POS-AT SERIES K (I5PE)

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Positivo POS-AT SERIES K (I5PE) (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ57BQ
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	67%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 100 53% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 151 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 35.8 30% 34.1 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 34.7 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 101 131 130 136 132 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.6% Below average	Read 226 Write 206 Mixed 107 SusWrite 129 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 16.4 51% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 18.6 DQ Write 10.7 DQ Mixed 11.8 10% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 55%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 928GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 138 138 140 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 136 Write 136 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 138 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 11.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-AT SERIES K (I5PE) Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-AT SERIES K (I5PE)

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
KingFast 480GBBench 66%, 584 samples	1x

RAM
SH564128FH8N0QHSCG 9E07 TMT325U6EFR8C-PBHJ 9801 9E07 TMT325U6EFR8C-PBHJ 12GBUnknownBench 27%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16