Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory45.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 12:05
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 907
79% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,978
122% 1,978 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3178) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.4% Average
Lighting 48
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 45
39% 49.5 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 48
Splatting 53.7
46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 396 314 278 276 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 452
Write 350
Mixed 396
SusWrite 318
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 35.2
123% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 156
128% 182 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
366GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1742 1858 1901 1926 1732 1867 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,868
Write 2,051
Mixed 1,308
SusWrite 1,838
398% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 56.3
186% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,272
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 702
569% 828 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 284%
Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
867GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1298 1433 1437 1296 1329 1316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,171
Write 1,393
Mixed 1,538
SusWrite 1,351
361% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 49.6
174% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1282
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 702
570% 830 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 263%
Great: 410%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
4GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 59 49 56 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 287
Write 69.5
Mixed 127
SusWrite 57.8
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 22.3
92% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 84.6
64% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 79.3
Write 81
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 78.4
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
76GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 15.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 46.3
24% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
159GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 178 181 181 179 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 136
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 180
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
13GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4 4 4.1 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13
Write 4.8
Mixed 2
SusWrite 3.9
6% 5.92 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 34.3
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 24.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,530
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback