Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 03:09
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 93%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$95
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 166
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 290
38% 280 Pts
64-Core 307
21% 307 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.2% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 103
Parallax 98.1
78% 99.2 fps
MRender 93
Gravity 91.8
Splatting 93.4
74% 92.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 87%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 170 101 124 125 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 441
Write 124
Mixed 280
SusWrite 130
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 26.3
92% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 14.8
95% 220 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 111%
WD Se 4TB-$108
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 98 99 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 83
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 97.7
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
754GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 94 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 92.4
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
444GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 88 88 85 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 87.2
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB
721GB free
Firmware: RAGNWA09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 152 153 155 155 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 112
Write 191
Mixed 104
SusWrite 156
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
329% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 4,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $788
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback