Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 00:20
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 518
68% 508 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.6
37% 38.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 36.6
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 28 73 102 29 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 416
Write 311
Mixed 298
SusWrite 86.7
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 13.5
69% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 30
43% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
482GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 157 160 160 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 111
Mixed 96
SusWrite 158
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 11 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 69.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 10.6
24% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
40% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 23
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $263
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback