| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190813 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 01 '20 at 23:21 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55%
Above average
|
62% 110 Pts
|
38% 288 Pts
|
20% 331 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
|
47.9%
Average
|
50% 63.2 fps
|
45% 55.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 31 45 11 119 103 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
45% 203 MB/s
|
51% 17.7 MB/s
|
30% 35.4 MB/s
|
|
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
28GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 68 41 37 38 32 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
45% 206 MB/s
|
56% 15.7 MB/s
|
68% 161 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown KD48GU88C-26N190A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
25.3%
Poor
|
26% 8.93 GB/s
|
16% 5.6 GB/s
|
33% 121 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,349 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,180x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 683x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 211x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 303x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 207x |
| GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 205x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |