PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds) |
Memory | 52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191204 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 01 '20 at 21:17 |
Run Duration | 240 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
74.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Viper M.2 VPN100 1TB
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1827 917 742 640 490 488 MB/s
|
194%
Outstanding
|
|||
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
98GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 66 72 99 110 88 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
739GB free
Firmware: RAGNWA09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 251 263 287 308 309 MB/s
|
||||
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
739GB free
Firmware: RAGNWA09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 231 218 217 221 221 MB/s
|
||||
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4
|
163%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples | 155x |
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples | 113x |
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples | 103x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 47x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,238Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 35x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $913 |