Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 18:17
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 132
56% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 430
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 531
36% 531 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$720
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 419
Reflection 395
Parallax 508
110% 441 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 407
Splatting 228
114% 321 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 114%
Great: 143%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 22
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 25.1
6% 25 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 34.3
6% 26.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$349
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 1236 1195 1177 1399 1361 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,061
Write 1,415
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 1,259
281% 1,239 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 36.4
134% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 545
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 162
156% 260 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 174%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 2,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback