Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7600-$130 622 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 60.8 1-Core 26.4 2-Core 53 32% 46.7 Pts	4-Core 53.3 8-Core 52.6 7% 52.9 Pts	64-Core 52.6 3% 52.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7950 GTX 93 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 019B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 307.68 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 3.03 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 0.72 2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 4,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT04L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 109 111 110 111 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.3% Below average	Read 112 Write 110 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 108 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 16.1 68% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 52.2 DQ Mixed 18 19% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce Go 7900NvidiaBench 1%, 122 samples	7x
GeForce Go 7950 GTXNvidiaBench 2%, 93 samples	5x
Quadro FX 1600MNvidiaBench 2%, 423 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16