Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120420
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '20 at 06:44
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 163 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 329 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 70.8 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 51.4 58% 62.7 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 72.5 Splatting 75 60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 94 44 52 52 52 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28% Poor	Read 189 Write 100 Mixed 102 SusWrite 71.5 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 11.3 51% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.5 DQ Write 23.1 DQ Mixed 13.9 12% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$14 6,096 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 217GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 91 90 89 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 91.4 Write 88.5 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 89.4 58% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 14 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	39x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	34x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	31x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
SU655 120GBAdataBench 68%, 3,439 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	9x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 21,220 samples	7x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16