Performance Results

Gaming 63%
Desktop 62%
Workstation 56%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIT PB50_70RF,RD,RC  (all builds)
MotherboardIT PB50_70RF,RD,RC
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 06:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 230
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 601
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 933
63% 933 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Clevo(1558 65D4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Lighting 266
Reflection 256
Parallax 272
70% 265 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 231
Splatting 178
71% 226 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 73%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7001T 1TB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0419A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 101 52 75 42 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 455
Write 419
Mixed 384
SusWrite 96.9
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 26.7
116% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 0.6
65% 151 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PB50_70RF,RD,RC Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 15%
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 54%

System: IT PB50_70RF,RD,RC

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback