Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 05:34
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 289
88% 168 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 963
84% 717 Pts
64-Core 2,042
126% 2,042 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.4
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 17.3
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$112
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 410 380 342 357 344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 416
Mixed 373
SusWrite 360
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 49.6
158% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 126
114% 175 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 126%
Corsair Force 120GB
100GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 40.1
Mixed 126
SusWrite 2.3
11% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
1% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 56%
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
57GB free
Firmware: 5.0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 144 122 133 135 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63% Good
Read 437
Write 159
Mixed 221
SusWrite 130
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 27.7
96% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 168
129% 175 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
388GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 123 122 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 122
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
170GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 60.1
Write 60.9
Mixed 41
SusWrite 57.6
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
11GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 4.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.5
13% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
123% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 24.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback