Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '20 at 04:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
QEMU Virtual version 2.5+ 272 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 48.4 1-Core 61.4 2-Core 110 42% 73.1 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 142 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (47 fps cap detected)	37.2% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 47.1 Parallax 40.5 37% 44.4 fps	MRender 41.2 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 47 37% 45.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 56 116 126 129 118 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16