Gigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140314
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 05 '17 at 10:02
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5557M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 57.1
38% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 98.5
8-Core 102
13% 100 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDAT120GB-DX 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 496
Write 101
Mixed 154
54% 250 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 13.3
62% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 42.1
46% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
729GB free
Firmware: JB0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 116
Write 82.9
Mixed 87.3
72% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.14
42% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Mac SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback