Lenovo 10154

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 10154  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 00:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 153
69% 112 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 189
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 2.06
2% 2.19 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2
2% 1.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC66
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,112
Write 30.2
Mixed 43.5
522% 728 MB/s
4K Read 426
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
17,867% 143 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10154 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback