Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 21:57
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 193
79% 134 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 504
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8529) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 33.7
32% 37.5 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 31.7
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 233 225 230 268 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 347
Write 260
Mixed 300
SusWrite 243
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 19.6
100% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 228
202% 304 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
79GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 23 31 43 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 127 112 118 144 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 88.2
Write 136
Mixed 68
SusWrite 123
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 90%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
44GB free
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 129 128 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 179
Write 159
Mixed 107
SusWrite 126
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.4
303% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 113%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
346GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 187
Write 133
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 124
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback