PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 839F |
Memory | 27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191209 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 30 '20 at 19:41 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
85.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P600
HP(103C 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA72H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1725 946 595 596 596 596 MB/s
|
275%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston A400 480GB-$37
280GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 189 317 192 251 257 MB/s
|
32.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
2TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 184 185 185 184 185 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
549GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 176 175 176 175 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
58.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7800XIntel $236Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 25x |
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples | 21x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $400Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 28x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 18x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $780 |