PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7817 |
Motherboard | MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150330 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 30 '20 at 19:28 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 23 25 25 22 23 MB/s
|
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
674GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 96 86 95 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
23%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 895x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 430x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 389x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 368x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 294x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 280x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $354 |