Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 days ago, 12 days ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 16:55
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 84
2-Core 152
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 322
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 324
22% 324 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 73%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA60B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 60 63 38 21 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 60
Write 51.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 40.8
32% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 2,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $368Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback