To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime25.8 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 133
57% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 470
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 887
60% 887 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$230
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.1% Very good
Lighting 292
Reflection 227
Parallax 264
77% 261 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 240
Splatting 178
71% 222 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme NE-512 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S062 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 378 320 411 526 495 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 668
Write 640
Mixed 461
SusWrite 360
119% 532 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 24.4
130% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 53
113% 225 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 101%
Great: 218%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
66GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 65.3
Write 69.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 74.4
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 67%
Standard S-ATA Hard Drive 320GB
100GB free, PID 0731
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 82 84 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 65.5
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 83.1
88% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 33.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 10,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $104
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $368Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback