| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120307 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 30 '20 at 07:56 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.5%
Good
|
67% 117 Pts
|
46% 349 Pts
|
22% 348 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
1.84%
Terrible
|
2% 1.8 fps
|
2% 2.79 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 91 39 51 6 52 MB/s
|
28.6%
Poor
|
45% 203 MB/s
|
30% 7.93 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
456GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 67 68 68 67 MB/s
|
46.4%
Average
|
59% 80.1 MB/s
|
198% 1.4 MB/s
| |
|
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
82GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 67 67 68 67 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
42% 57.8 MB/s
|
132% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.6%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
49% 81.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 579 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 103x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 85x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 44x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 56x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 33x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 26x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $335 |