PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C09 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds) |
Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181112 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 30 '20 at 06:25 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 190 18 76 25 41 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
779GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 160 157 159 157 153 MB/s
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
45%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,311x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,500x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 291x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 635x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 462x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 356x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |