MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 22:25
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 81.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 772
76% 624 Pts
64-Core 1294
80% 1294 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 133
Parallax 135
122% 139 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 137
Splatting 107
113% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 43 60 44 64 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.8% Poor
Read 195
Write 87.5
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 71.4
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 10.4
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 14.3
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 102%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$92
918GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1982 2059 1555 1507 1490 1505 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,443
Write 2,220
Mixed 1,764
SusWrite 1,683
455% 2,027 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 75.4
251% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 877
644% 853 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 316%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 133 134 135 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 80.5
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 132
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
338GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 131
Write 84.2
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 110
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 135 134 136 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 67
Write 106
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 133
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
192% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2866 MHz clocked @ 1433 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 32.6
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 26.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback