Acer AOD260

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer AOD260  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AOD260
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 20:50
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Memory 45.9
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 11.8
18% 21.6 Pts
4-Core 12
8-Core 12
2% 12 Pts
64-Core 11.9
1% 11.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 52 46 51 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
23% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 41.9
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 46
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23%
Great: 36%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.8 4.8 4.5 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 5.2
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 4.9
10% 9.93 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AD 484D50313235533645465238432D53362020 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.41% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback