Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110322
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '20 at 19:28
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 52.6 2-Core 105 52% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 254 29% 228 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 130 Parallax 121 88% 119 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 126 Splatting 103 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 116 115 117 118 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.1% Poor	Read 162 Write 98.8 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 114 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 11.9 44% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 26.3 DQ Mixed 16.7 14% 19 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 490GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 48 43 50 49 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 36.5 Write 49.5 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 47.4 28% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 8192, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.5% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 10.5 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 8.2 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA770T-UD3 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	21x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	15x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	7x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	19x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	18x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $174

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16