PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180424 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '20 at 19:15 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
63.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$54
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 98 79 64 52 MB/s
|
22.5%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 5.1 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s
|
6.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm3_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm6_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm7_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 268x |
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 143x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |