Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 40 2-Core 81.6 41% 63.1 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 191 19% 156 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1662) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.84 1% 1.14 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 89 92 90 90 93 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 223 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 8.6 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	98x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	50x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 555 samples	9x
ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 2x4GBKingstonBench 46%, 253 samples	8x
SSA302G08-GDJEC 2x4GBAsintBench 47%, 787 samples	7x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $260

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16