Asus P5QD TURBO

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5QD TURBO (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090804
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '20 at 16:13
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 109 51% 80.8 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 198 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 83.3 50% 70.2 fps	MRender 66 Gravity 58.9 Splatting 53.7 48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 80 47 12 37 47 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56% Above average	Read 231 Write 209 Mixed 215 SusWrite 66.1 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 30.6 124% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 22.9 DQ Mixed 76.1 65% 101 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 86%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 318GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 28GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 70 60 65 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 56.5 Write 51 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 61.4 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 61%
Mass Storage Device 16GB 765 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 12GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 4 6.5 5.2 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 5.3 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 5.5 10% 8.32 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.1 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QD TURBO Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QD TURBO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	26x
Core2 Duo E7600Intel $191Bench 40%, 4,159 samples	7x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
830 64GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,094 samples	4x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	43x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16