Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 438
56% 421 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 39.9
23% 33.7 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 28
Splatting 32.1
25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,389
Write 1,790
Mixed 1,211
397% 1,796 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 48.5
173% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 931
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 170
210% 397 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
893GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 182 183 183 184 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 178
Mixed 105
SusWrite 180
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
4TB free
Firmware: 0401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 24.1
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
232% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 90%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 31.4
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 15.8
37% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 86%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
530GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 30.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 22.2
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
468GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 34.8
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 2.6
10% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
13% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 37%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback