Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 91.8 2-Core 176 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 360 38% 307 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0102) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.12 1% 1.26 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 2.3 2% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP35 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 95 Write 43.5 Mixed 62.2 50% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 4x4GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 11,344 samples	9x

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $235

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16