PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H97M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160328 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '20 at 01:38 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4150-$42
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
62.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
POV(1ACC 56A2) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ssd2sc24 0G1CS2754D117-48 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS211101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 267 275 277 278 278 MB/s
|
86.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
233GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 127 121 127 124 124 MB/s
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 583x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 388x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 305x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 199x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 192x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 159x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $277 |