Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 153 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 303 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	138% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 217 Parallax 231 144% 208 fps	MRender 249 Gravity 206 Splatting 135 154% 197 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,491 Write 1,195 Mixed 788 256% 1,158 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 52.6 190% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 575 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 503 363% 474 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 93%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1GB free Firmware: 000F Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 338 Write 190 Mixed 220 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 15.8 95% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 29.7 49% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
WD FILEIO 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 538GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 83 76 81 82 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 27% Great: 45%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.5 1.8 3.1 3.1 2.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	1.25% Terrible	Read 2.7 Write 1.7 Mixed 3 SusWrite 2.2 3% 2.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.25% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 140%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16