Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '20 at 11:18
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 53.2 1-Core 114 2-Core 230 70% 132 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 291 39% 289 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Lighting 17 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 21.3 14% 18.2 fps	MRender 9.05 Gravity 16.7 Splatting 21 13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: P190710b SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 461 459 464 465 463 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 398 Mixed 403 SusWrite 461 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 43.2 163% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 226 174% 232 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 212GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 127 127 127 127 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 142 Write 151 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 126 81% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 7.2 8.8 12 8.9 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 21 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 10.4 25% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 2.8 207% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 31,969 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.2 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	412x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	194x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16