Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8603
Memory	5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200409
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '20 at 05:30
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 157 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 332 30% 249 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 5,557 User benchmarks, average bench 89% HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.8% Poor	Lighting 23.9 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 5.53 20% 28 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 33.6 Splatting 62.5 44% 52.7 fps
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1006 256GB 3,914 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10112006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 338 291 357 377 363 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 924 Write 862 Mixed 795 SusWrite 358 165% 735 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 20.1 64% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 602 DQ Write 71.2 DQ Mixed 1.9 87% 225 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 217%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB 1,446 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 260GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 236 215 248 238 245 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.8% Below average	Read 262 Write 259 Mixed 210 SusWrite 236 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 7.3 18% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 86%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 396GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 68 84 85 82 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 129 Write 124 Mixed 26 SusWrite 80.2 65% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB 20,226 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 20.3 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples	446x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	411x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	318x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	258x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	207x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	97x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	378x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	120x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	113x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16