| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161214 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 27 '20 at 16:32 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.2%
Very good
|
82% 145 Pts
|
44% 326 Pts
|
20% 325 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7750
Asus(1043 0427) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
10% 13.8 fps
|
10% 11.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB-$90
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 202 201 198 200 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
38% 172 MB/s
|
101% 34.1 MB/s
|
137% 189 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
804GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 143 140 140 145 MB/s
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
91% 124 MB/s
|
162% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
41.7%
Average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-DVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 366 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 36x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 34x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 42x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 25x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |