Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '20 at 12:28
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 110 2-Core 177 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 220 33% 240 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3777) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.6% Above average	Lighting 71.4 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 60.7 58% 67.9 fps	MRender 61.6 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 68.6 54% 65 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1759 Write 1,376 Mixed 1,195 320% 1,444 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 46.3 168% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,113 DQ Write 845 DQ Mixed 778 636% 912 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 240GB 4,783 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 178GB free Firmware: SBFM71.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 84 68 60 61 61 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.5% Above average	Read 269 Write 103 Mixed 280 SusWrite 114 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 22.1 88% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 168 161% 249 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 475GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 144 158 158 158 161 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 150 Write 133 Mixed 31 SusWrite 155 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 3,586 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.5% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 24.3 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 16.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	45x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	43x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	51x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	40x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	29x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,043

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16