| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 9.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190313 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 26 '20 at 20:38 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85.5%
Excellent
|
81% 140 Pts
|
65% 513 Pts
|
34% 544 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
9.98%
Terrible
|
9% 7.36 fps
|
12% 13.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 44 46 27 29 3.6 MB/s
|
34.4%
Below average
|
45% 204 MB/s
|
49% 24.9 MB/s
|
15% 34 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
513GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 124 126 126 124 MB/s
|
74.9%
Very good
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
191% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.3%
Good
|
67% 23.4 GB/s
|
60% 21 GB/s
|
62% 64.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,359 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,631x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 998x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 940x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 687x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 550x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 362x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |