| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191225 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 26 '20 at 19:48 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
91.4%
Outstanding
|
96% 178 Pts
|
87% 710 Pts
|
66% 1,060 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
113%
Outstanding
|
102% 167 fps
|
144% 186 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 272 266 263 256 248 MB/s
|
97.5%
Outstanding
|
90% 402 MB/s
|
147% 51.3 MB/s
|
272% 363 MB/s
|
|
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
520GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 126 127 128 128 MB/s
|
67.9%
Good
|
67% 92.3 MB/s
|
126% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
90% 31.5 GB/s
|
78% 27.3 GB/s
|
52% 77.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 43x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 19x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 16x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $795 |