Apple MacBookPro14,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro14,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B4831CEBD52A0C4C
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7360U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 79.2
37% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 188
18% 148 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Apple(106B 0174) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7373
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 5.78
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 8.39
6% 6.84 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1338
Write 1,013
Mixed 891
240% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 18.2
80% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 442
329% 432 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424A54414C41522D4E5644 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro14,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro14,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback