Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 19:57
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 206
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 432
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 56.1
54% 63.4 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 70.6
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 312 313 301 308 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 468
Mixed 442
SusWrite 307
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 31.1
148% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
263% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 128%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
111GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 86 86 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 454
Write 391
Mixed 373
SusWrite 121
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 22.5
113% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 33.6
85% 175 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
152GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 109 106 106 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 93.8
Mixed 65
SusWrite 106
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 15.5
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback