ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ER181AA-UUB A1338HK

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP ER181AA-UUB A1338HK (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI AMETHYST-M
Memory	2.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '17 at 09:58
Run Duration	692 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 117 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 97.2 1-Core 12.3 2-Core 17.6 37% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 23.3 8-Core 24.1 3% 23.7 Pts	64-Core 23.8 2% 23.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO 1,167 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gainward(10B0 0801) 384MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	4.78% Terrible	Lighting 6.27 Reflection 6.88 Parallax 2.5 5% 5.22 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 5.47 Splatting 4.26 4% 5.16 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.78% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galaxy GX0240ML105-G 256GB 422 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10182 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2347 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2068 (A9) Unknown 100 100 2228227 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 182 182 4323803444 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 399 (C2) HDA temperature 60 60 257700003880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	14.6% Very poor	Read 98.6 Write 90.2 Mixed 79 20% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.34 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 3.49 15% 5.97 MB/s	DQ Read 6.71 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 4.79 5% 8.94 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 76%
CREATIVE MuVo T200 4GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free, PID 4160 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.94% Terrible	Read 10.1 Write 3.52 Mixed 4.61 7% 6.09 MB/s	4K Read 2.82 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 11% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.94% Great: 4%
PQI Traveling Disk 2GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 0046 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Read 11.1 Write 3.29 Mixed 1.14 5% 5.18 MB/s	4K Read 3.18 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 13% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x1GB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.3 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 49.5 81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback