MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 824
85% 684 Pts
64-Core 1033
64% 1033 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.7% Very good
Lighting 91.2
Reflection 83.1
Parallax 77.7
74% 84 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 72.1
70% 87.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 170 173 173 181 173 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 85.5
Write 140
Mixed 194
SusWrite 169
34% 147 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 13.2
64% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 71.5
78% 132 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40%
Great: 102%
Intenso Sata III 127GB
16GB free
Firmware: P1111A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 148 148 149 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 482
Write 149
Mixed 204
SusWrite 140
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 28.9
112% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 92.5
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 100
82% 114 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 89%
WD Elements 25A1 5TB
859GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 20 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 19.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 20.1
26% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 35.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 34.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $899
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback