Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 09:56
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 194
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 644
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 62.3
58% 67.8 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 56.2
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
539GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 2138 1117 1103 1123 1101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,351
Write 1,931
Mixed 1,409
SusWrite 1,469
401% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 68.3
228% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 734
531% 694 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 285%
Great: 372%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
146GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 264 65 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 328
Write 291
Mixed 258
SusWrite 138
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 24.8
107% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 143
124% 182 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
39GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 86 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50% Average
Read 85.6
Write 60.7
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 88.5
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
51GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 115 119 118 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 117
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
55GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 67 69 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 55.1
Write 88.9
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 67.5
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 70%
Samsung S2 Portable 320GB
114GB free, PID 1f03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 25.1
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 37.6
44% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GB-$97
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 35.7
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $924
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback