Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 09:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$161
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 689
73% 583 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB; inno3D Gtx 1660S
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 85
Parallax 79.7
77% 86.3 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 72.7
68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 3.4 4.4 38 4.1 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 414
Write 271
Mixed 300
SusWrite 38.2
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 13.1
45% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 34.6
32% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 56%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
166GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 379 380 374 363 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 433
Mixed 419
SusWrite 383
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 58.6
193% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
863GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 168 164 166 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 151
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 167
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 23
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback