Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	122.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130219
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '20 at 20:33
Run Duration	389 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6376 51 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 87 44% 66.8 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 281 29% 232 Pts	64-Core 1,018 63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Lighting 66 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 61.5 54% 65.7 fps	MRender 75.4 Gravity 64.3 Splatting 57.4 53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 238GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 174 172 172 172 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.1% Average	Read 162 Write 156 Mixed 146 SusWrite 173 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 25.3 83% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 64 DQ Mixed 34 29% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 119 121 118 118 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44% Average	Read 155 Write 152 Mixed 148 SusWrite 117 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 28.1 91% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 31.9 DQ Write 64 DQ Mixed 44.9 35% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 133%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 78GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 90 92 91 91 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 130 Write 126 Mixed 100 SusWrite 92.5 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 326% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 107%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 171 165 177 171 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 142 Write 166 Mixed 120 SusWrite 173 111% 150 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 394% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 107%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 149 148 148 147 148 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 130 Write 163 Mixed 138 SusWrite 149 108% 145 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 407% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS72303 3TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 726GB free Firmware: A800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 122 125 124 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 14.2 Write 122 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 124 56% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 175 176 177 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 146 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 174 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS72303 3TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2.5TB free Firmware: AA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 147 149 150 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 146 Write 154 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 149 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 93%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3.5TB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 127 126 126 127 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 142 Write 166 Mixed 112 SusWrite 128 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 324% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 107%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 8.5TB free Firmware: MKAOAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 158 160 162 158 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 227 Write 201 Mixed 166 SusWrite 160 140% 189 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 1.2 426% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 87%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 155GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 103 101 101 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 128 Write 136 Mixed 107 SusWrite 101 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 310% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 107%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71 7,245 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 794GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 163 162 163 166 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 206 Mixed 137 SusWrite 165 127% 172 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 362% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 107%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 8TB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4.5TB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 102 104 106 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 158 Write 100 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 102 125% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 98%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 8TB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4.5TB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 102 106 103 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 204 Write 85.2 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 104 144% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 23% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-024.A00LF 8x16GB 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.8% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 14 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16